Thalassa
Permabanned
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 25,183
- MBTI Type
- ISFP
- Enneagram
- 6w7
- Instinctual Variant
- sx
Radfems are stuck somewhere approximately Valerie Solanis, as in, Who Shot Andy Warhol. They were throw backs twenty years ago when I was sixteen. They are NOT mainstream third wave feminists. While I have my own personal grievances with Andy Warhol as a cerebral narcissist who abused Edie Sedgwick (dead) and Mary Waronov (alive, elderly, scoffing at his absurd rejection)...the simple fact is gay, Catholic virgin Warhol was an ass, but to elevate him in your mind to something more powerful was giving away your power (Mary v.Edie, though I always took the side of Edie) ...it's kind of the same way with Radfem, they make monsters, in their minds, who factually are often broken themselves. If you tell me Warhol was not a broken individual, I will laugh at you.
Radfems are stuck in victimhood. Feminism is something much more meaningful than that. How can I be a victim to someone else's neurosis, as a woman over 25-30 who isn't a drug addict? I used to play this game, women are taught to play this game, to predators and trolls, but mature women realize the trolls are broken too...shouldn't mature women be guiding this movement?
Radfems are stuck in victimhood. Feminism is something much more meaningful than that. How can I be a victim to someone else's neurosis, as a woman over 25-30 who isn't a drug addict? I used to play this game, women are taught to play this game, to predators and trolls, but mature women realize the trolls are broken too...shouldn't mature women be guiding this movement?
