If you condense Mellon Collie to about one album's worth, it's easily one of the best rock albums of the 90s. It tends to suffer the fate of most double albums of oversaturating the listener with content and losing momentum throughout parts of the album.
Yeah, there’s very few double albums I can listen to in one sitting. Even the White Album and The Wall feel bloated to me. I’ve tried to edit The White Album down to about a 46 minute playlist. Most Beatles single albums and albums in general didn’t exceed 50 minutes in the days of vinyl because of the loss of fidelity due to decreased groove size in longer albums.
But I had trouble getting a selection and sequence I was happy with. I guess I’m just too used to hearing it a certain way, that it felt wrong removing certain tracks.
I’ve noticed with albums released after the dawn of CD, they started getting longer, since you can fit 80 minutes on one CD. But I feel like a lot of bands just started padding their albums with filler songs. A lot of vinyl reissues of 90s albums have to be on two LPs because so many were well over 50 minutes.
I think Corgan was deeply hurt by Adore being a flop (to be fair, I think that's an amazing album, yet was too radically different from everyone's expectations and their own prior work to really be given a fair shake) and thus he kinda checked out a bit afterwards. All his post Adore songwriting just seems very bland and vanilla, mostly unforgettable tracks that aren't necessarily bad but just kinda get lost in the shuffle of more engaging alternatives.
I remember rushing out to buy the Adore CD. I like the incorporation of electronic elements because I was pretty heavy into Depeche Mode and Prodigy at the time.
It’s kind of a lose lose for bands that get as huge as that. If they try to do something new, they get shit for either selling out or breaking from a loved formula. If they release an album in the same style as the last, critics and fans are likely to accuse them of repeating themselves.
I think people thought they wanted Mellon Collie II, but had that been what they made, people would’ve complained they’d become too one note.
Smashing Pumpkins seemed to take a trajectory similar to U2 after Adore.
My favorite U2 period was from Achtung Baby to Pop, because it was pretty experimental and there was a sense of adventure in those 3 albums. But Pop didn’t do as well, so I think they just went to a very generic, uninspired formula with most everything after that. I can’t stand anything they’ve made since 2000.
Musical thought for the day: Kid A is pretentious garbage. I silently judge people who tell me it's equal to or better than OK Computer. That album is /r/im14andthisisdeep in musical form. I'm a music snob -- deal with it.
For a long time I considered Kid A the greatest and most original album ever made. But then I discovered some old art rock bands like Can and Kraftwerk and realized Kid A really wasn’t all that groundbreaking. I also hear a lot of influence from Bowie’s Low. They just blended that classic art rock aesthetic with EDM and more modern production techniques.
But I also think Kid A helped them get out of a rut. They needed to do that one and Amnesiac before they could (sort of) go back to basics with Hail. I wonder if they’d gone straight from OK to Hail, what the fan and critics reactions would’ve been..
In Rainbows is my favorite. I listened to OK computer so much I think I got permanently tired of it. But then I also rarely listen to Kid A anymore. But I’ll still listen to Hail to the Thief or In Rainbows fairly often. Sometimes The Bends. Maybe I’ll listen to OK Computer tomorrow and see how it’s aged.