Amargith
Hotel California
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2008
- Messages
- 14,717
- MBTI Type
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 4dw
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
Adding meaning to that which is meaningless is meaningless.
Narrowmindedness is such a pity
Adding meaning to that which is meaningless is meaningless.
Narrowmindedness is such a pity![]()
Yes, your reluctance to admit that all your silly efforts are in vain could be called narrowmindedness as well.
Learn to laugh. Just once a while...it has its perks
Also..it's not my mission to show you how to find meaning in life. I already have a fulltime job![]()
I don't remember asking.
Agreed...existence is entirely meaningless. All conquests are in vain. The universe exists for "nothing" (probably).
Deep down most INTJs realize this and we simply use ENFPs (or anyone else) to satisfy our instinctual carnal desires and our utter sense of despair. Its temporary relief. But I have a feeling that this "using of others" is what is glorified and called "love" (in all relationships), whether the parties involved realize it or not.
Hence, I suspect that relationships where INTJs and ENFPs do not get along are those in which the INTJ realizes the senselessness of it all, and the silly (and annoying) ENFP foolishly believes in the aggrandized (traditional) concept of "love".
Wow, just had a beautiful morning with my INTJ boyfriend, took a ridiculously hard yoga class, for me, not for him,Agreed...existence is entirely meaningless. All conquests are in vain. The universe exists for "nothing" (probably).
Deep down most INTJs realize this and we simply use ENFPs (or anyone else) to satisfy our instinctual carnal desires and our utter sense of despair. Its temporary relief. But I have a feeling that this "using of others" is what is glorified and called "love" (in all relationships), whether the parties involved realize it or not.
Hence, I suspect that relationships where INTJs and ENFPs do not get along are those in which the INTJ realizes the senselessness of it all, and the silly (and annoying) ENFP foolishly believes in the aggrandized (traditional) concept of "love".
Agreed...existence is entirely meaningless. All conquests are in vain. The universe exists for "nothing" (probably).
Deep down most INTJs realize this and we simply use ENFPs (or anyone else) to satisfy our instinctual carnal desires and our utter sense of despair. Its temporary relief. But I have a feeling that this "using of others" is what is glorified and called "love" (in all relationships), whether the parties involved realize it or not.
Hence, I suspect that relationships where INTJs and ENFPs do not get along are those in which the INTJ realizes the senselessness of it all, and the silly (and annoying) ENFP foolishly believes in the aggrandized (traditional) concept of "love".
What difference does it make? We all die in the end.
What difference does it make? We all die in the end.
Agreed...existence is entirely meaningless. All conquests are in vain. The universe exists for "nothing" (probably).
I'd say you're overdue an NFP to show you how to enjoy life and make it meaningful![]()
Adding meaning to that which is meaningless is meaningless.
Narrowmindedness is such a pity![]()
Yes, your reluctance to admit that all your silly efforts are in vain could be called narrowmindedness as well.
Learn to laugh. Just once a while...it has its perks![]()
Nietzsche said:“Would it not be necessary?†. . . No, three times no! You young Romantics: it should not be necessary! But it is very likely that things will end up like that—that you will end up like that—namely, “being consoled,†as it stands written, in spite of all the self-training for what is serious and frightening, “metaphysically consoled,†in short, the way Romantics finish up, as Christians. . . . No! You should first learn the art of consolation in this life—you should learn to laugh, my young friends, even if you wish to remain thoroughly pessimistic. From that, as laughing people, some day or other perhaps you will for once ship all metaphysical consolation to the devil—and then away with metaphysics! Or, to speak the language of that Dionysian fiend called Zarathustra:*
“Lift up your hearts, my brothers, high, higher! And for my sake don’t forget your legs as well! Raise up your legs, you fine dancers, and better yet, stand on your heads!â€
“This crown of the man who laughs, this crown wreathed with roses—I have placed this crown upon myself. I myself declare my laughter holy. Today I found no one else strong enough for that.â€
“Zarathustra the dancer, Zarathustra the light hearted, who beckons with his wings, a man ready to fly, hailing all birds, prepared and ready, a careless and blessed man.â€â€”
“Zarathustra the truth-teller, Zarathustra the true laugher, not an impatient man, not a man of absolutes, someone who loves jumps and leaps to the side—I myself crown myself!â€
“This crown of the laughing man, this crown of rose wreaths: you my brothers, I throw this crown to you! Laughter I declare sacred: you higher men, for my sake learn— to laugh!â€
How old are you, Mr. Time?
I've gone through those thoughts/feelings before.
Eventually, I got over them. As you will, if you have the strength.
(I also happen to be the INTJ boyfriend from the post above.)
Perhaps it was your weakness (not strength) which made you reluctant to continue down the path of unforgiving, merciless "logic" and "reason"? It is a painful path that most are reluctant and unable to pursue. I believe that one must abandon all previously held notions of understanding and follow logic to find "truth". In this pursuit, logic (with the help of science) leads to the statement that "life is meaningless". When this stage of the journey is reached, most abandon the pursuit and force themselves to think of it no more (since the unmoving forces of Fear and Pain oppose the journey). Many will also assume that was the end of the journey.
However, the more I pursue these thoughts, the more understanding I seem to have. I have not (yet) ceased this journey of continuous hopelessness. And I refuse to do so, simply because others tell me that I must abandon it to achieve "happiness". I don't live my life based on the principles of hedonism. If pursuing logic causes me lifelong misery, then so be it. Since, in the end, none of it matters anyway.
I am in my early 20s, not too much younger than you, I suspect.
You are young, so very young.Perhaps it was your weakness (not strength) which made you reluctant to continue down the path of unforgiving, merciless "logic" and "reason"? It is a painful path that most are reluctant and unable to pursue. I believe that one must abandon all previously held notions of understanding and follow logic to find "truth". In this pursuit, logic (with the help of science) leads to the statement that "life is meaningless". When this stage of the journey is reached, most abandon the pursuit and force themselves to think of it no more (since the unmoving forces of Fear and Pain oppose the journey). Many will also assume that was the end of the journey.
However, the more I pursue these thoughts, the more understanding I seem to have. I have not (yet) ceased this journey of continuous hopelessness. And I refuse to do so, simply because others tell me that I must abandon it to achieve "happiness". I don't live my life based on the principles of hedonism. If pursuing logic causes me lifelong misery, then so be it. Since, in the end, none of it matters anyway.
I am in my early 20s, not too much younger than you, I suspect.
Yeah, I was in my early 20s when I did the exact same thing.
Trust me, it's not the end of the road.
What you should do is read philosophy, cuz science has no answers to these issues.
Do you know what the root of the word "logic" is?
It's logos, which, in Greek, simply means "word".
That's all logic is: words, and a system of grammar.
Read about Wittgenstein's idea of the language game.
Also read about the idea of metanarratives.
You are simply caught up in a particular language game, a particular metanarrative.
There is not necessarily any inherent truth to this particular game or narrative.
I am very familiar with your reluctance to leave this particular narrative, as it feels very true to you at this moment.
I felt the exact same way, about almost the exact same narrative.
Trust me, it's not the only way of looking at the world, and, if you learn to expand your language game beyond this current nihilistic one, you will look back on this period of your life as just that: a period.
"Logic" and "reason" don't inherently lead to the conclusion that life is meaningless.
Your current "logic", or language game, has led to that conclusion.