Quadruple or nothing it's an ENTJ posing as an INTP in order to boost the perceived approval of ENTJs in an obvious bid for more minions.
It's far too generalised. Besides, ENTJ being an ideal match for me? We would probably have an argument every day. How is that ideal?
Minions are more of an ENFJ thing. We're more of a "if you want something done, do it yourself" type mentality, by and large.
Also, someone who is interested me because of perceived popularity as opposed to whatever my individual merits might be, is probably not gonna make that select 10% group.
Minions are more of an ENFJ thing. We're more of a "if you want something done, do it yourself" type mentality, by and large.
Also, someone who is interested me because of perceived popularity as opposed to whatever my individual merits might be, is probably not gonna make that select 10% group.
Wha? All ENTJs are CEOs, and CEOs are all about minions.
I don't think we're big on minions. At least, based on what that word implies. People we organize and direct as needed? Definitely. That happens naturally.
Something to think about before you go jumping into a relationship:
![]()
I think the fact that this chart pairs ISFPs with ENFJs says it all. I can't think of a more ill-suited pairing.
Minions are more of an ENFJ thing. We're more of a "if you want something done, do it yourself" type mentality, by and large.
Also, someone who is interested me because of perceived popularity as opposed to whatever my individual merits might be, is probably not gonna make that select 10% group.
One of my closest friends is an INTP guy that I dated a while back. The ease of communication and flow of ideas between us is probably the reason he's one of the only exes I was able to be friends with after the fact. I literally spend most of the day at work shooting the shit with him on gchat.
As with any pairing, it depends on the ENTJ and it depends on the INTP. If both are pretty secure, than it's actually a better pairing in my experience than IFPs are for us as the fundamental concerns tend to be the same, even if the approach is different. I tend to prefer T's over F's in general, though, just because I feel there's a level of accommodation required in T/F relationships (especially if the F is the guy) that I'm just not willing to do at this point.
Also, what INTP doesn't enjoy arguing?![]()
Are you looking for an honest response here or for me to assume sort of caricature for you?
Something to think about before you go jumping into a relationship:
![]()
So why does the NTs not have the "uh oh, think this one through" section at all? Are we just willing to bend over?
It's because everyone loves us. (The poor schmucks.)So why does the NTs not have the "uh oh, think this one through" section at all? Are we just willing to bend over?
It's because everyone loves us. (The poor schmucks.)
I'm looking for the truth in a system that is fundamentally untrue.
If that's your goal, then I would begin with a line of inquiry that was a bit more genuine in its own right.
It's because everyone loves us. (The poor schmucks.)
Yeah, that's weird that the NFs are allegedly incompatible with all of the Sensing types. Are NFs really that unaccommodating? I doubt it.
In my estimation, 'isn't that the NF is unaccommodating (non-roomy-"dating"??)...it's that they are "head-in-the-clouds" or flaky space cadets, which drives the immediate-sensation-types *crazy*.
And some NFs tend to get deep feelings hurt and not communicate it well...Scylla and Charybdis.
Just my 0.02 worth; only not even that, because I'm offering it for free. And you get what you pay for...
So why does the NTs not have the "uh oh, think this one through" section at all? Are we just willing to bend over?